Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics | Members | Log In | Register

Human/Warrior or Elf/Priest Options
Tiberium14
Posted: Sunday, March 02, 2008 4:37:46 PM

Rank: Peasant
Groups: Member

Joined: 3/2/2008
Posts: 10
ok.... i just started 2 days ago i have a lvl 4 warrior and a lvl 5 priest what class is cheaper/funner/easier to play in the game? and what one is just better at combat.
lakers4eva
Posted: Sunday, March 02, 2008 4:57:07 PM
Rank: Peasant
Groups: Member

Joined: 12/1/2007
Posts: 10
Location: Romania
Well it depends on your playing stile, what do you like to do. Those two are exact oposit, warrior is kinda a tank(say kinda couse warebeast is the better tank but warrior is good too) and the priest well heals. The first is in the frontline and the second is in the back. In this game the priest is pretty good soloer too, at least till mid levels, after that i dono. I'm a warrior (lvl 55) and i can tell you it ain't easy, but i'm guessing non of the classes are too easy.
Going by cheaper, well my guess is priest is a bit cheaper to play, becouse he's not hit as much so no need for repairs that much, but in the same time he needs more mana pots. Anothe thing to consider is the fact that with a priest is easier to make friends, everybody needs a healer in their party, and the priests buffs are very good too, so i'd say as a first caracter go priest, and if you really want a tank then warebeast is more suited as a tanker then the warrior. I just like to stand out from the crowd so i keep playing with my warrior.
thinh4u2
Posted: Sunday, March 02, 2008 5:59:15 PM
Rank: Peasant
Groups: Member

Joined: 7/28/2007
Posts: 30
Location: VA, usa
Tiberium14 wrote:
ok.... i just started 2 days ago i have a lvl 4 warrior and a lvl 5 priest what class is cheaper/funner/easier to play in the game? and what one is just better at combat.


1.at higher levels, cheaper might be priest...but not by alot. (WR is only cheaper when you do mount zhen...aoe party)

2. easier to play, probably warrior. in all games the warrior is the standard class.

3. funner, that is a question u have to ask urself. do u want to heal/buff/attack with magic spells, or be front line aoe, melee, area stun?

4. better at combat...there are many types of combat in general. PvP they are both good, in war...both are very useful....against mobs, WRs can solo much more easily, flying and water mobs are easier for priests.

with that all being said, good luck Smile


btw...that other guy is wrong. WRs have high def can and take alot of hits, but by no means are WRs "tanks" because we lack a skill to hold aggro. (bosses are immune to stun)
lakers4eva
Posted: Sunday, March 02, 2008 8:33:26 PM
Rank: Peasant
Groups: Member

Joined: 12/1/2007
Posts: 10
Location: Romania
Lol, and where exactley was i wrong? I did say warebeast is better at tanking then wariors, didn't i?
Tenzy
Posted: Monday, March 03, 2008 6:59:03 AM
Rank: Peasant
Groups: Member

Joined: 8/17/2007
Posts: 32
noone of the job is cheap higher lvl drain alot money like water per skills..
priest, wf i think is pretty good job for solo easy,

Prist vs magic monster = Np HP pots Mp hiro

Wf fight all = np beside hurts without cure maybe need Mp pots HP pots if not hiro

melee job war wb archer need pots whole time mostley or hp Hiro to be alive longer : )

but all job is good end game beside maybe watchout for pk mages if u are melee they can tick alittle hp:P

Server: Europe ----- Guild: Myst

Main Character:
Jenny - Elf priest lvl 70
Crafting
Tailor lvl 6
smithinglvl 5
Jewller lvl 6


Users browsing this topic
Guest


Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Main Forum RSS : RSS

Powered by Yet Another Forum.net version 1.9.1.7 (NET v2.0) - 11/20/2007
Copyright © 2003-2006 Yet Another Forum.net. All rights reserved.

Impressum