|
|
Rank: Peasant Groups: Member
Joined: 11/19/2007 Posts: 28
|
How does Agi exactly effect the dmg? Does Agi increase dmg by a certain amount? Or is it more a kind of factor?
PS: i am not talking about criticals. that is clear.
|
|
 Rank: Servant Groups: Member
Joined: 7/9/2007 Posts: 352 Location: Somewhere on the island of Borneo, Malaysia
|
tekie wrote:How does Agi exactly effect the dmg? Does Agi increase dmg by a certain amount? Or is it more a kind of factor?
For Wing Archer only: Each point of agility give additional: +8 Accuracy +6 Evasion And as you probably know already, for every 20 agility point, 1% chances of Critical Hit Code: +1% x Base Damage points of Your(Ranged weapon + Ring Modifiers + current player level) Wrong!
Edit: The damage calculation is more complex than I thought Master of the Pearly Tower
|
|
Rank: Peasant Groups: Member
Joined: 11/19/2007 Posts: 28
|
are you really sure about this? with 135 AGI: my +20 patk ring gives 38 patk and not sth like 45+.
|
|
Rank: Servant Groups: Member
Joined: 9/4/2007 Posts: 54 Location: Philippines
|
could u be more clear on the damage equation???"+1% x Base Damage points of Your(Ranged weapon + Ring Modifiers + current player level) "
So if my weapons does 1200k damage and + 200 for rings and 100 for level and i have 400 dex... does that mean: 400% x 1500 = total damage?? and btw does the skills that add +% weapon damage go before or after the addition of damage:
ex. 400%X [200 + 100 +(1200 x 160%)] or is it [400%x(200 +100 + 1200)]+(1200x60%)
1200 = weapon damage 200 = rings 100 = lvl
So how does it go?
|
|
 Rank: Servant Groups: Member
Joined: 7/9/2007 Posts: 352 Location: Somewhere on the island of Borneo, Malaysia
|
To tekie and Tugudug:
The damage calculation is incorrect, sorry for wasting our all time.
Master of the Pearly Tower
|
|
Rank: Peasant Groups: Member
Joined: 11/19/2007 Posts: 28
|
*sign*
i would really like to know the formular for it -_-.
|
|
Rank: Peasant Groups: Member
Joined: 11/19/2007 Posts: 28
|
@TowerMaster: u mean not complete. The formula is correct. But there is an addional term, which include the equip Atk again.
|
|
|
Guest |